This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: PR gas/10637: x86 assembler failed to handle [addr] in Intel mode


On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
>>>> "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> 15.09.09 15:46 >>>
>>I will take a look.
>>
>>Please tell me which version masm you used. Mine doesn't
>>take [] as immediate.
>
> I used 8.00.50727.42, 7.10.3077, and 7.00.9466 - which all give the
> same result.
>

For MASM 8.00.50727.42, we got


      OPTION DOTNAME
_TEXT SEGMENT      'CODE'
       ALIGN     16
      PUBLIC f1
f1    PROC
        mov       eax, 1
        mov       eax, [1]
        mov       eax, DWORD PTR [1]
        mov       eax, DWORD PTR 1
        ret
        ALIGN     16
::
f1 ENDP
_TEXT ENDS
_DATA SEGMENT      'DATA'
_DATA ENDS
_DATA SEGMENT      'DATA'
_DATA ENDS
EXTRN __ImageBase:PROC
      END

MASM produces this:

f1:
  0000000000000000: B8 01 00 00 00     mov         eax,1
  0000000000000005: 8B 04 25 01 00 00  mov         eax,dword ptr [00000001h]
                    00
  000000000000000C: 8B 04 25 01 00 00  mov         eax,dword ptr [00000001h]
                    00
  0000000000000013: B8 01 00 00 00     mov         eax,1
  0000000000000018: C3                 ret
  0000000000000019: 0F 1F 80 00 00 00  nop         dword ptr [rax+00000000h]
                    00

It doesn't match you what you described. Can you try our test?

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]