This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [patch] More DWARF-4 support
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Cary Coutant <ccoutant at google dot com>
- Cc: Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:54:35 -0600
- Subject: Re: [patch] More DWARF-4 support
- References: <c17be2b30908191719u51ac2dcak45e376ab3aa544f7@mail.gmail.com> <m3eiqvor1l.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <c17be2b30908281232sfa25bbbl2d5ce6194dc9c158@mail.gmail.com> <m3y6p361pa.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <c17be2b30908281508v3e113bd5r7612e97efe5f6403@mail.gmail.com> <m3k50jznr5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <c17be2b30909031757g34e042cbg887ee18021976afe@mail.gmail.com> <c17be2b30909221327s6af3ddbcuc36c3629c24ea3d5@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
>>>>> "Cary" == Cary Coutant <ccoutant@google.com> writes:
>>> I think that for a GNU extension it would be best for the document to be
>>> hosted on a GNU site. ÂThat way we have some amount of control over the
>>> existence and contents of the document.
Cary> I've updated the patch so that dwarf2.h now points to the
Cary> ThreadSafetyAnnotation wiki page for the thread safety extensions, and
Cary> to the just-created DwarfSeparateTypeInfo wiki page for the
Cary> DW_AT_odr_signature attribute.
Thanks, I appreciate this.
Someone else will have to approve the patch. FWIW, though, the dwarf2.h
bits look unobjectionable to me.
Tom