This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Replace _XXX with XXX_P

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at redhat dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:36:08 +0100
Subject: Re: PATCH: Replace _XXX with XXX_P
References: <20091215165810.GA13847@lucon.org> <m34onsf9dc.fsf@hase.home> <6dc9ffc80912150922u7e7da75em9ea3bbc0ac1525e5@mail.gmail.com>

"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> writes:

> What did you mean? When/where can applications use _xxxx?

Outside of file scope (in the ordinary and tag namespace).  Basically
that means identifiers without linkage, like parameter names.

> Gcc defines a bunch of _mm_xxx intrinsics.

These are file scope identifiers.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84  5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
"And now for something completely different."

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: Replace _XXX with XXX_P
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- PATCH: Replace _XXX with XXX_P
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Replace _XXX with XXX_P
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: PATCH: Replace _XXX with XXX_P
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]