This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch/RFA]: Patch to fix R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 relocation truncated bug

From: Christophe LYON <christophe dot lyon at st dot com>
To: Matthew Gretton-Dann <matthew dot gretton-dann at arm dot com>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:44:04 +0100
Subject: Re: [Patch/RFA]: Patch to fix R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 relocation truncated bug
References: <1263477671.28149.21.camel@cam-bc3-b12.cambridge.arm.com> <20100115003439.GE8112@bubble.grove.modra.org> <1263825396.18030.17.camel@cam03638.cambridge.arm.com> <20100119040211.GI8112@bubble.grove.modra.org> <1264420828.2057.13.camel@cam-bc5-b9.cambridge.arm.com>

Hello,

2010-01-18 Matthew Gretton-Dann<matthew.gretton-dann@arm.com>

	* ld-arm/jump-reloc-veneers-long.d: New test.
	* ld-arm/jump-reloc-veneers-short1.d: Likewise.
	* ld-arm/jump-reloc-veneers-short2.d: Likewise.
	* ld-arm/jump-reloc-veneers.s: Likewise.
	* ld-arm/arm-elf.exp (armelftests): Run them.

On a trunk extracted yesterday, I observe that all these tests fail (target arm-none-eabi). There seem to be a discrepancy between the start address defined as -defsym _start=0x8000 in arm-elf.exp and expected to be 00008054 <[^>]*>: 8054: f000 bfd4 b.w 9000 <dest> in jump-reloc-venners-short1.d for instance.

Am I missing something?

Christophe.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch/RFA]: Patch to fix R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 relocation truncated bug
  - From: Matthew Gretton-Dann

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]