This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: overhead of bfd_{get,put}*()

From: David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>
To: espindola at google dot com
Cc: iant at google dot com, binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 05:44:31 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: overhead of bfd_{get,put}*()
References: <mcrwry3a1c3.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com> <20100223.171031.104059418.davem@davemloft.net> <38a0d8451002240521o427cd626p7a5ea8f7745387cf@mail.gmail.com>

From: Rafael Espindola <espindola@google.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:21:02 -0500

>> No linker script.
>>
>> I assume you are testing exclusively on sparc like I am ;-)
>>
> 
> 32 or 64 bits?  Could you try the --keep-files-mapped option?

32-bit GOLD linking 64-bit object, same situation as I'm
using with the BFD linker.

I'm going to analyze the situation, sit tight.  Right now I'm fighting
a bug in the 'perf' tool's symbol handling that triggers when I use it
on GOLD.

References:
- Re: overhead of bfd_{get,put}*()
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: overhead of bfd_{get,put}*()
  - From: David Miller
- Re: overhead of bfd_{get,put}*()
  - From: Rafael Espindola

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]