This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: binutils 2.20.1 not mentioned on web site, not tagged?
- From: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>
- To: Chris Demetriou <cgd at google dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 09:24:36 +0200
- Subject: Re: binutils 2.20.1 not mentioned on web site, not tagged?
- References: <AANLkTi=KohDGNN7SyjLtitNi9Y0XC=pA1GOyVqcy4nGo@mail.gmail.com>
On Sep 4, 2010, at 1:01 AM, Chris Demetriou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for various reasons I was just looking a bit more closely at the 2.20.1 release.
>
> I note that it's not mentioned on the web site
> (http://sourceware.org/binutils/), and also (worse) doesn't seem to be
> tagged in CVS!
> (e.g., search for "CVS Tags" on
> http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/binutils/ChangeLog?cvsroot=src&only_with_tag=binutils-2_20-branch)
>
> (I also saw the thread at
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-03/msg00066.html about some
> other irregularities.)
>
>
> I don't really care about the lack of web site announcement, or other
> oddities, but the lack of tagging causes me concern...
> Should somebody go back and try to find the right date (ugh ... i
> "miss" using CVS all the time 8-) to tag the release?
Indeed, I forgot to tag 2.20.1. If you really need this version, you can use the source tarball.
Tristan.