This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Bug for darwin + windows


On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:49:59PM -0500, NightStrike wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 06:10:37PM -0500, NightStrike wrote:
>> >> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
>> >
>> > configure with --disable-werror
>>
>> Can't we just fix the warnings? ?That doesn't seem like the "right" solution....
>
> I think you have a crazy version of gcc. ?Fix it. ?The prototype gcc
> is warning about comes from

I don't understand what that is supposed to mean.

The shadowed variable is within binutils... from ldmain.h to libbfd.h.
 You are refusing to address that within your own product?

> /*
> INTERNAL_FUNCTION
> ? ? ? ?bfd_generic_get_relocated_section_contents
>
> SYNOPSIS
> ? ? ? ?bfd_byte *bfd_generic_get_relocated_section_contents
> ? ? ? ? ?(bfd *abfd,
> ? ? ? ? ? struct bfd_link_info *link_info,
> ? ? ? ? ? struct bfd_link_order *link_order,
> ? ? ? ? ? bfd_byte *data,
> ? ? ? ? ? bfd_boolean relocatable,
> ? ? ? ? ? asymbol **symbols);
>
> DESCRIPTION
> ? ? ? ?Provides default handling of relocation effort for back ends
> ? ? ? ?which can't be bothered to do it efficiently.
>
> */
>
> If we strip parameter names here we lose some documentation. ?I've
> done that in the past and received complaints. ?Renaming parameters is
> a never-ending exercise.
>
> --
> Alan Modra
> Australia Development Lab, IBM
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]