This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Handle STT_GNU_IFUNC symols when building shared library

From: Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org, rdsandiford at googlemail dot com
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:20:38 +1030
Subject: Re: PATCH: Handle STT_GNU_IFUNC symols when building shared library
References: <20110106184700.GA21076@intel.com> <87fwt5kau9.fsf@firetop.home> <AANLkTim-2LG7YeZ+82NC44NurkWY_6xgshysMORAAZ7N@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 01:21:48PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> That is probably true.  However, unless there is a testcase to show
> it is wrong to do so, I don't want to change it.

Why do you need a testcase?  This is not the first time someone has
kindly pointed out a fundamental problem with your code that you
refuse to fix properly.  I find that attitude annoying, to say the
least.

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: Handle STT_GNU_IFUNC symols when building shared library
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- PATCH: Handle STT_GNU_IFUNC symols when building shared library
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Handle STT_GNU_IFUNC symols when building shared library
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: PATCH: Handle STT_GNU_IFUNC symols when building shared library
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]