Re: [x/6][PATCH] Portability tweaks for LTO tests.

["H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>]

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ? ?Hi list,
>
> ?This is out of the main series, because it's a couple of tweaks to the LTO
> tests in HJ's branch; included here for reference, since I've been running
> tests with it folded in. ?I notice it's slightly outdated here, as upstream HJ
> has already added gcc_ld_flag (and gcc_gas_flag, in fact) to the ld/12365 test
> in lto.exp, so that bit won't apply cleanly, but the second change in that
> hunk (adding a '_?' prefix to the regex) is still needed. ?FYI, YMMV.
>
> ld/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2011-02-20 ?Dave Korn ?<...
>
> ? ? ? ?* ld-plugin/lto-10r.d: Allow optional underscore prefixes when
> ? ? ? ?checking for known symbol name.
> ? ? ? ?* ld-plugin/lto-3r.d: Likewise.
> ? ? ? ?* ld-plugin/lto-5r.d: Likewise.
> ? ? ? ?* ld-plugin/lto-6.c: Handle non-standard etext name on Windows.
> ? ? ? ?* ld-plugin/lto.exp: Add $gcc_ld_flag carrying -B option to ld under
> ? ? ? ?test when invoking $CC directly rather than via lib support routines.
>
>

I added a new test LTO-16 into my branch.  If you send me a patch against
commit d33f411f8648104187e369c99d71204e54303bbd, I will
include it on  my branch.

Thanks.


-- 
H.J.