This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Release 2.23: Ping

From: Matthew Gretton-Dann <matthew dot gretton-dann at linaro dot org>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>, binutils Development <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 09:54:26 +0100
Subject: Re: Release 2.23: Ping
References: <2E74490B-BCE6-4D8E-A6F1-737A1625DAA4@adacore.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1208312249380.12630@tp.orcam.me.uk> <CB844284-E8F6-47F0-B826-0200362085C5@adacore.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1209031518030.28358@tp.orcam.me.uk> <9596AE4D-C319-48C5-89E4-CB5201D9A4DA@adacore.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1209041726300.28358@tp.orcam.me.uk> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1209050140370.28358@tp.orcam.me.uk>

On 5 September 2012 01:56, Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>
>  Here's the resulting list of regressions:
>
> arm-aout  +FAIL: Valid v8-a+cryptov1
> arm-aout  +FAIL: Valid v8-a+fp
> arm-aout  +FAIL: Valid v8-a+simdv3
> arm-aout  +FAIL: Valid v8-A barrier (ARM)
> arm-aout  +FAIL: Valid v8-A barrier (Thumb)
> arm-aout  +FAIL: Valid v8-a
> arm-coff  +FAIL: Valid v8-a+cryptov1
> arm-coff  +FAIL: Valid v8-a+fp
> arm-coff  +FAIL: Valid v8-a+simdv3
> arm-coff  +FAIL: Valid v8-A barrier (Thumb)
> arm-epoc-pe  +FAIL: Valid v8-a+cryptov1
> arm-epoc-pe  +FAIL: Valid v8-a+fp
> arm-epoc-pe  +FAIL: Valid v8-a+simdv3
> arm-epoc-pe  +FAIL: Valid v8-A barrier (Thumb)
> arm-pe  +FAIL: Valid v8-a+cryptov1
> arm-pe  +FAIL: Valid v8-a+fp
> arm-pe  +FAIL: Valid v8-a+simdv3
> arm-pe  +FAIL: Valid v8-A barrier (Thumb)
> arm-wince-pe  +FAIL: Valid v8-a+cryptov1
> arm-wince-pe  +FAIL: Valid v8-a+fp
> arm-wince-pe  +FAIL: Valid v8-a+simdv3
> arm-wince-pe  +FAIL: Valid v8-A barrier (Thumb)

I'll take a look at these.

I don't think they should necessarily hold up the release though as
the EABI targets (arm-none-eabi, arm-none-linux-gnueabi) all pass
these tests for me.

Maciej, Did you run any ARM EABI variants?

Thanks,

Matt

-- 
Matthew Gretton-Dann
Linaro Toolchain Working Group
matthew.gretton-dann@linaro.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Release 2.23: Ping
  - From: Tristan Gingold
- Re: Release 2.23: Ping
  - From: Maciej W. Rozycki

References:
- Re: Release 2.23: Ping
  - From: Tristan Gingold
- Re: Release 2.23: Ping
  - From: Maciej W. Rozycki
- Re: Release 2.23: Ping
  - From: Tristan Gingold
- Re: Release 2.23: Ping
  - From: Maciej W. Rozycki
- Re: Release 2.23: Ping
  - From: Maciej W. Rozycki

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]