Re: Release 2.23 ?

[Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>]

On Oct 24, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:

> On 22.10.2012 16:20, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> 
>> On Oct 22, 2012, at 6:44 AM, Kenny Simpson wrote:
>> 
>>>>> No news for about 2 weeks.  Is the release still
>>>> 'soon'?
>>>> 
>>>> Yes.
>>>> I hope to make the release next week.
>>> 
>>> This week?  Any blocking bugs/late fixes/etc.. ?
>> 
>> Now released.  I will announce it tomorrow.
> 
> there seem to be more oddities with this release, maybe somebody could double-check.
> 
> - bfd/doc has a lot of not-removed .texi files, which are not
>   found on the branch.

Yes, that was part of the missing commit.

>     2.23/bfd/doc/aoutx.texi
>     2.23/bfd/doc/archive.texi
>     2.23/bfd/doc/archures.texi
>     2.23/bfd/doc/bfd.info
>     2.23/bfd/doc/bfdio.texi
>     2.23/bfd/doc/bfdt.texi
>     2.23/bfd/doc/bfdver.texi
>     2.23/bfd/doc/bfdwin.texi
>     2.23/bfd/doc/cache.texi
>     2.23/bfd/doc/coffcode.texi
>     2.23/bfd/doc/core.texi
>     2.23/bfd/doc/elf.texi
>     2.23/bfd/doc/format.texi
>     2.23/bfd/doc/hash.texi
>     2.23/bfd/doc/init.texi
>     2.23/bfd/doc/libbfd.texi
>     2.23/bfd/doc/linker.texi
>     2.23/bfd/doc/mmo.texi
>     2.23/bfd/doc/opncls.texi
>     2.23/bfd/doc/reloc.texi
>     2.23/bfd/doc/section.texi
>     2.23/bfd/doc/syms.texi
>     2.23/bfd/doc/targets.texi
> 
> - the aarch64 ld testsuite is not included, the directory
>   ld/testsuite/ld-aarch64 is missing.

As far as I know (but I might be wrong here), the aarch64 testsuite was not in the patchset I
backported to the release.  Aarch64 people in CC:

Tristan.