This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: cleanup PT_GNU_STACK size handling
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan_sidwell at mentor dot com>
- Cc: binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 15:00:27 -0700
- Subject: Re: cleanup PT_GNU_STACK size handling
- References: <507D7311.10101@mentor.com> <20121022020428.GI3263@bubble.grove.modra.org> <508535F3.9000306@mentor.com> <20121022141608.GQ3263@bubble.grove.modra.org> <5085692F.6010801@mentor.com> <20121022233007.GR3263@bubble.grove.modra.org> <5086339C.5070408@mentor.com> <CAMe9rOpv-b16-PmYXi2WWnUbCaadLgjSGDr5b-VjcNTJYTsd-g@mail.gmail.com> <509286C8.4020008@mentor.com>
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Nathan Sidwell
<nathan_sidwell@mentor.com> wrote:
> On 10/26/12 23:42, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Nathan Sidwell
>> <nathan_sidwell@mentor.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/23/12 00:30, Alan Modra wrote:
>>>
>>> thanks for more background on -z noexecstack etc. Here's a patch
>>> incorporating the (non-)change you wanted. Tested as before.
>>>
>>
>> Could you please add -z stack-size to "ld --help"?
>
>
>
> done.
>
I think we should use "STACK segment" to match RELRO
messages.
--
H.J.