This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Scan for Mach-O start address in LC_MAIN and properly check bfd_mach_o_scan_start_address's return value

From: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
Cc: David Albert <davidbalbert at gmail dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 09:23:34 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Scan for Mach-O start address in LC_MAIN and properly check bfd_mach_o_scan_start_address's return value
References: <CAKYxTUYkjYQyPzOvTXQNJEyH10YJxy=H1YppPCDuVz=AT1Ln3g@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.02.1211221955490.70249@dair.pair.com>

On Nov 23, 2012, at 1:58 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, David Albert wrote:
>> - I ran `make check` in the binutils tree both before and after
>> applying the patch and found no visible. I've included the results
>> below. You can find the full output here:
>> https://gist.github.com/4120289. Are there other tests I need to run?
> 
> You actually need to run "make -k check" (not just "make check")
> to run the full testsuite or else "make" will stop after any
> submodule check that has errors, like in this case, binutils.
> To wit, you didn't run the linker or assembler tests.

Yes, but neither gas nor ld were ported to Mach-O.

References:
- [PATCH] Scan for Mach-O start address in LC_MAIN and properly check bfd_mach_o_scan_start_address's return value
  - From: David Albert
- Re: [PATCH] Scan for Mach-O start address in LC_MAIN and properly check bfd_mach_o_scan_start_address's return value
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]