This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Why should $LARGE_DATA_ADDR affect $OTHER_BSS_SECTIONS? Hmm, I see LARGE_SECTIONS=yes adds .lbss to OTHER_BSS_SECTIONS. That's not very nice as quite a few targets use OTHER_BSS_SECTIONS for other purposes. Your patch makes this even more confusing. Also, since you seem to want a separate large segment, do you really want to lay out your large sections as .lbss, .lrodata, .ldata? Wouldn't .lrodata, .ldata, .lbss make more sense?
Also, there isn't much point in adding support for -Tldata-segment here without the rest of the support, so that needs adding or simply omit use of SEGMENT_START().
I committed your fix for RODATA_ADDR. Thanks!
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |