This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
RE: [PATCH] MIPS EVA ASE Support
- From: "Moore, Catherine" <Catherine_Moore at mentor dot com>
- To: Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford at googlemail dot com>
- Cc: "Rozycki, Maciej" <Maciej_Rozycki at mentor dot com>, "binutils at sourceware dot org" <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:51:56 +0000
- Subject: RE: [PATCH] MIPS EVA ASE Support
- References: <FD3DCEAC5B03E9408544A1E416F11242F8FC6EE7 at NA-MBX-01 dot mgc dot mentorg dot com> <87fvwz9hsg dot fsf at talisman dot default> <FD3DCEAC5B03E9408544A1E416F11242F8FC9639 at NA-MBX-01 dot mgc dot mentorg dot com> <87bo7g99yn dot fsf at talisman dot default> <FD3DCEAC5B03E9408544A1E416F11242F8FC9A3B at NA-MBX-01 dot mgc dot mentorg dot com> <87ip1l7oz9 dot fsf at talisman dot default> <FD3DCEAC5B03E9408544A1E416F11242F8FCA5F6 at NA-MBX-01 dot mgc dot mentorg dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 1 dot 10 dot 1306121710190 dot 16287 at tp dot orcam dot me dot uk> <87sj0n5g4t dot fsf at talisman dot default> <FD3DCEAC5B03E9408544A1E416F11242F8FE593D at NA-MBX-04 dot mgc dot mentorg dot com> <87txkwo33v dot fsf at talisman dot default>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:rdsandiford@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 5:10 PM
> To: Moore, Catherine
> Cc: Rozycki, Maciej; binutils@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS EVA ASE Support
>
>
> > Index: gas/testsuite/gas/mips/mips.exp
> >
> ==========================================================
> =========
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gas/testsuite/gas/mips/mips.exp,v
> > retrieving revision 1.222
> > diff -p -u -r1.222 mips.exp
> > --- gas/testsuite/gas/mips/mips.exp 14 Jun 2013 13:30:28 -0000 1.222
> > +++ gas/testsuite/gas/mips/mips.exp 17 Jun 2013 20:28:48 -0000
> > @@ -849,6 +849,8 @@ if { [istarget mips*-*-vxworks*] } {
> > [mips_arch_list_matching mips64r2 \
> > !micromips]
> >
> > + run_dump_test_arches "eva" [mips_arch_list_matching
> mips32r2 !octeon]
>
> For the record, this is going to fail on ecoff, as Maciej pointed out for one of
> the other recent patches. I'm planning to significantly trim the amount of
> testing we do on ecoff though -- hopefully within the week -- so let's commit
> this as-is.
>
> OK with those changes (or non-change in the last case), thanks.
>
Should I hold off on fixing the other ecoff test failure? I was going to look at that next.