This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: RFC: binutils PATCH: Set e_type to ET_EXEC for -pie -Ttext-segment=
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: LKML <linux-kernel at vger dot kernel dot org>, Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 14:47:06 -0800
- Subject: Re: RFC: binutils PATCH: Set e_type to ET_EXEC for -pie -Ttext-segment=
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAMe9rOob2T+VWkZyHpaoBy6fUeTyAocpw4-cBpdrar2rtdAeew at mail dot gmail dot com> <20131210223615 dot GA10239 at bubble dot grove dot modra dot org>
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 07:10:23PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> Linker sets e_type in ELF header to ET_DYN for -pie -Ttext-segment=0xXXX.
>> When I added -Ttext-segment=0xXXX, one goal was to load
>> small model executable above 4GB on Linux/x86-64, which
>> was done with -pie -Ttext-segment=0xXXX. But -pie sets
>> e_type in ELF header to ET_DYN and kernel may ignore
>> p_vaddr in ELF header to load ET_DYN binary at a random
>> address. This patch changes ld to set e_type in ELF header
>> to ET_EXEC if the first PT_LOAD segment has non-zero
>> p_vaddr. If this is unacceptable as generic ELF change,
>> I can make it specific to x86.
>
> Well, I suppose it's a hack to use ET_DYN for executables in the first
> place, so one more hack in the linker hardly matters. Why not just
> patch the kernel though? The kernel can look at the first PT_LOAD
> header just as easily as the linker, and it's the kernel that is doing
> the loading after all.
>
Kernel should have some freedom on where to load ET_DYN object.
But when -Ttext-segment= is used, programmer expects the
executable will be loaded at the specified address. Setting
ET_EXEC will guarantee that it will be loaded at that address.
--
H.J.