This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wednesday 15 January 2014 11:57:45 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 20:25:18 +0400 > > From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> > > Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > > But even with this example, it isn't just a repeat. > > I didn't say it was just a repeat, I said most of it just repeats. > > > The text before the ChangeLog says what the intent of the patch is, > > and provides extra information that usually doesn't go into the > > ChangeLog entry. For example, it says "This makes it usable in more > > places". > > Why not have this as part of the log entry. Here's an example (from > Emacs): i'd lobby for just stopping the ChangeLog practice altogether :) -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |