This is the mail archive of the cgen@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the CGEN project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: make CGEN a less moving target?


Frank Ch. Eigler writes:
 > The most important value is the base-insn-size.  This should be
 > large enough to include all opcode-like bits in the longest
 > instruction, so most likely 16 or even 32 for this chip.  Having
 > real instructions that are shorter than that is not a problem.

If the definition of base-insn-size has been changed to this that's a bummer.
When did this go in?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]