This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@cygnus.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
It seems that Doug Evans said: > From: Don Yuniskis <dgy@rtd.com> > > From: Don Yuniskis <dgy@rtd.com> > > I'm looking for any pointers folks might have wrt > > building cross tools for H8 targets. I've been stumbling > > through the binutils (2.7) build trying variations > > of "h8300" targets (e.g., h8300, h8300-coff, etc.) > > and seem to always catch *some* sort of problem in the > > configure or build stages. > > > > I know I've tested the examples in the FAQ for h8300-coff. > > Oops. When I said h8300-coff I meant to say h8300-hms. Heh heh heh... a little bit of a difference there! :> > For some pieces it doesn't matter. Random searching showed > newlib checks for h8300-*-hms*. > > Was this recently (i.e. 2.7 binutils -- not the 2.6 binutils > referenced in the FAQ)? > > Can't remember. I'll give it a try to see what happens (with h8300-hms). h8300-hms builds OK (I haven't tested any of the routines yet, though). h8300-coff falls down since ld gets passed "DEFAULT_EMULATION=h8300-unknown". I'll poke around in the configure.tgt script and see if rewriting the *-*-coff rule can help me through this (though there's enough BFM in the configure scripts that I wouldn't know if this would be the *right* solution...) Thanks! --don