This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@cygnus.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
>At 10:39 AM 1/23/98 -0500, you wrote: >> >>I think you miss the point in the US PTO. It is not to be "social" >>about trade secrets, but rather to protect intellectual property that is >>otherwise too easy to copy. In the case of software, copyright will do >>just fine. > >I don't understand Richard's point. But the purpose of Patents is both to >provide protection to the inventor's economic interests while at the same >time making the information freely available (social benifit). After 21 >years (I believe) anyone is free to use it as well. The inventor's economic interests, in the sense you mean, are perfectly well served by trade-secret law. (I think patents actually "started" prior to that law, but a similar effect is achived just by keeping stuff secret. I believe TS law merely provides for legal remedies when employees or other contacts "leak" stuff claimed to be trade secrets. Without this law, just keeping stuff secret works pretty well.) So, the *purpose* of patents is to encourage publication of knowledge that might otherwise be kept secret, or kept under trade secret law. The *mechanism* by which this is accomplish is to offer certain legal and economic incentives. However, there are other mechanisms that could accomplish the same purpose, to greater or lesser extents. Giving the patented/secret material legal status as a form of capital is a typical ploy of a society that is based on capitalistic notions, which happens to be true of ours, and I think happens to be the best approach to most socioeconomic problems. But if the mechanism becomes unwieldy, or unfair, as I believe has certainly happened due to putting too many "marginal" kinds of knowledge (such as algorithms, aka software) into the same category of capital, then it is quite reasonable to reconsider the mechanism separately from, or carefully in conjunction with, reconsidering the underlying purpose, which is to keep people from keeping too many important things secret. tq vm, (burley)