Re: Multi-architecture installation

["Pierre Saucourt-Harmel (r54698)" <pierre dot saucourt-harmel at motorola dot com>]

David Korn wrote:

> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Joel Sherrill [mailto:joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com]
> >Sent: 28 March 2001 18:07
>
> >I know this works well with the RTEMS cross toolsets.  We distribute
> >RPMs for crosses to about 10 architectures.  They all install into the
> >same --prefix and there are no conflicts.
> >
> >One warning would be to avoid giving options like --program-prefix
> >which change the names of the installed tools.  The default install
> >names are clear enough.
>
>   Yes, I should have made this clearer.  Use a --prefix setting if you
> really want, but don't use any of the more advanced settings (exec-prefix
> and so on).  Even better is just use no prefix and accept the default
> of /usr/local; there still won't be any danger of things clashing.
>
>     DaveK
> --
>  All your base are belong to us!

Thanks for your these pieces of advice. Thanks to David and Joel. That's
clear enough for me.

Regards,
Pierre.



------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com