This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Phil: I'll update the script, then. b.g. On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 06:59:31AM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: > >The *compiler* is acceptable for all arm architectures, but what about > >glibc? > > Same applies. The ARM GNU/Linux ABI is deliberately identical on all machines. > > >concern is that if you build glibc for arch-sa1100, it may fail > >silently (or loudly) on an arch-tbox, or seomthing that isn't an armv. > > Even on non-armv machines you should be OK. But since that hardware has been > obsolete for the best part of a decade, and is essentially unsupported by > modern kernels, I wouldn't lose too much sleep over it. Binaries are > definitely portable between tbox and sa1100. > > p. > > > ------ > Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ > Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com > -- Bill Gatliff bgat@open-widgets.com ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |