This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
* Quality Quorum <qqi@world.std.com> on Thu, Sep 20, 2001: > > > On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, M. R. Brown wrote: > > > * Quality Quorum <qqi@world.std.com> on Thu, Sep 20, 2001: > > > > > > > > It fails on build because configure thinks that --without-headers is > > > an equivalent of --with-headers=no and it trying to install > > > sys-includes from non-existing directory `no'. > > > > > > > It shouldn't fail doing that, at least, it's never failed for me. > > If you already have include files (say you are rebuilding) it would > not fail. > Wrong. If you're building a bootstrap compiler, you can specify --with-newlib to cause gcc to define the inhibit_libc variable and *not* include header files. In this instance --without-headers is completely unecessary. To build a bootstrap compiler (e.g. the first pass or "chicken" of the chicken/egg scenario) configure --with-newlib and use the all-gcc and install-gcc targets of the Makefile. e.g. make all-gcc make install-gcc You also probably want to skip building C++, f77, etc. in the bootstrap, so configure with --enable-languages="c". See Bill's FAQ for more examples. M. R. ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |