This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
"Curt Mills, WE7U" wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, Jesus Ferrandis wrote: > > > I have to do a C compiler for PICmicros. > > Not a very educated opinion here, but it can be done. > There's a port for a 68HC11 compiler that works, I'm aware of TWO GCC-ports for m68hc11/12, the second having support for m68hc16 too... e:\usr\local\samples>gcc-m68hc16-coff -v Reading specs from e:\usr\local\lib\gcc-lib\m68hc16-coff\2_95.3-1\specs gcc version 2.95.3-1 20010315 (release) The Stephane Carrez one uses ELF, the another, Real-Time Systems ? one uses COFF... > and ports for Z80 as well. Never heard... The SDCC-("Small Device C Compiler"?) project has '8051' and 'z80' ports, but it isn't GCC... Haven't checked LCC from Princeton lately either -- a claim about it being better for 8/16-bitters has been done there... Whether the 'GBDK-2.0' ("GameBoy DK") which used 'LCC' is the father of the SDCC is unclear... BTW, there is a port of GCC for STMicroelectronics ST9, "GCC9" via: http://eu.st.com/stonline/products/support/mcu8/st9/stv4.htm Anyone aware where to find patches against a plain vanilla GCC-release for this port? Or if it seems that this 'commercial release' doesn't agree with the GNU-license, are there any legal actions going on to get this port 'opened'? Cheers, Kai ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |