This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: invalid option for gcc?

From: y dot rutschle at indigovision dot com
To: Aymeric MOIZARD <aymeric dot moizard at wellx dot com>
Cc: crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 12:55:07 +0000
Subject: Re: invalid option for gcc?
References: <3C99CC93.195EB97E@wellx.com>

On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 01:05:39PM +0100, Aymeric MOIZARD wrote:
> cc1: Invalid option `apcs-32'
> cc1: Invalid option `tune=strongarm1100'
> cc1: Invalid option `short-load-bytes'
> cc1: bad value (armv4) for -march= switch
> 
> Any tips? Must I get another gcc?

Sounds like you aren't using a cross-gcc, or not one for ARM
anyway. Typically one GCC only targets one type of machine
(which you can find with "gcc -dumpmachine"). If that gcc-3
you are using is, as I suspect, indeed a native gcc, you'll
need to build one specifically for your target.

HTH
Yves

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

References:
- invalid option for gcc?
  - From: Aymeric MOIZARD

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]