This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:34:07AM +0100, kkk wrote: > i already successfully compiled cygwin's binutils-20021117-1 in > mipsel-linux- > equivalent in the common way: > mkdir binutils-20021117-1 > cp -R /usr/src/binutils-20021117-1/* binutils-20021117-1/ > cd binutils-20021117-1 > ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --target=mipsel-linux; > make; > make install; That's not actually the most common way: you are compiling in the directory of the source code. > i have trouble with cygwin's gcc-3.2-3: using the same procedure, i > configure for mipsel-linux, but there are not > generated Makefiles (but configure prints several "Creating Makefile...") I am not positive, but I remember having problems trying to do that (building in the source tree). Try building in a different directory. For binutils as above, you would do: mkdir binutils-build cd binutils-build /usr/src/binutils-20021117-1/configure --prefix=/usr/local --target=mipsel-linux make It *should* not make a difference, but GCC building is somewhat touchy. HTH, Y. ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe at sources dot redhat dot com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |