This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: FAQ: how to build a statically-linked gcc?


On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 04:49:16PM -0400, Jeff Sturm wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > Hmm - We should perhaps discuss what the --enable/disable-shared/static
> > switches are supposed to do......:) Should they affect the 'target' (the
> > bins gcc will generate) or the 'host' (the resultung gcc/g++)?
> I haven't read much of this thread, but I'm a bit surprised that
> anyone expects --disable-shared to do other than what is documented, i.e.
> 
> gcc:
>   --disable-shared        don't provide a shared libgcc
> libstdc++-v3:
>   --enable-shared=PKGS  build shared libraries default=yes
> libjava:
>   --enable-shared[=PKGS]  build shared libraries [default=yes]
> libf2c:
>   --enable-shared[=PKGS]  build shared libraries [default=yes]
> libobjc:
>   --enable-shared[=PKGS]  build shared libraries [default=no]
> 
> None of this suggests that any behavior resembling the `-static' compiler
> switch is intended.
Hmm.. probably because I have a bug somewhere in my head.. ;)

Severe cafeine deprivation..

sorry,
rlc


-- 
Many people are unenthusiastic about their work.

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]