This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: order of constructors

From: Peter Barada <peter at the-baradas dot com>
To: gcc at ggcc dot gnu dot org, crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 21:10:26 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: order of constructors

Is there any way to control the order of static constructors so that
some that access other functions are done after those functions
intializing fucntions are done?

I guess I'm really asking is there any way to collect together a group
of static constructors and then have them 'constructed' *after* some
initialization functions for objects/libraries that they refer to have
been called? 

-- 
Peter Barada
peter@the-baradas.com

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: order of constructors
  - From: Bill Randle
- Re: order of constructors
  - From: Erik Christiansen
- Re[2]: order of constructors
  - From: Lyon

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]