This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi all! I use GCC on a Renesas SH processor, without OS. I do not use much from newlib (practically only malloc(), memcpy() and a few other utils, and new from libstdc++). I do not use exceptions, no rtti, IO or anything else. Now I would like to use STL. My first try using vector<> (just defining a vector<int>) resulted in increasing the binary size by cca. 240KB. :-( It practically included everything: exception handling, streams, locale, newlib IO etc. Unfortunately, this is not affordable to me, so I wonder what can I do? I have invented that the key is the stl-inst.o in libstdc++, which is included by std::__default_alloc_template, and includes functexcept.o, which includes everything. Functexcept.o would not include anything if it would compile without the macro __EXCEPTIONS defined. I have copied functexcept.cc to my project, and use the versions calling abort() instead of exceptions. With this, using a vector increased my project with a reasonable size of 15K. Is it an ugly hack what can cause me problems, or is it the Right Way? Or I should recompile libstdc++ without exception support? How can I do that? (I use a binary crossgcc from KPIT; never compiled GCC.) Thanks, Ferenc ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |