This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
>>>Caution: I never added Java fixes for ppc405's erratum 77! >>>See http://kegel.com/xgcc3/ppc405erratum77.html and be very >>>suspicious on threading problems on older ppc405 chips in java. >> Eeeww... Do you have an idea whether this has any effect on the 405EP? > You need to go find the IBM Errata sheet for the chip in question. > It's at http://www-306.ibm.com/chips/techlib/techlib.nsf/products/PowerPC_405EP_Embedded_Processor > I believe the same problem might be present there, renamed CPU_210. Well, the errata at that site doesn't contain a bug named CPU_210, nor anything similar to the problem in erratum 77. > The gcc bug report for this was http://gcc.gnu.org/PR7383 Further, according to the final comment in gcc's bugtracking system, it should be fixed in gcc 3.3: "GCC 3.3 includes the fix when GCC is configured for PPC405." > Only now am I testing gcj at all, and don't use the ppc405 anymore (I switched jobs). Now that's a shame (o: Regards, Martin ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |