This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Well, I'm not asking that specifically (o: - I was just wondering whether you could see if placing the "-Os" there would be the correct place in order for it to be propagated all the way to the creation of libgcj?I was wondering: If I want to compile my toolchain with another optimization level - e.g. "-Os" - how do I do this?Now I've tried with "-Os" as optimisation, but I'm not able to see any difference in library-sizes. My libgcj.so is still around 50 megs - which is the same as before...
Does the TARGET_CFLAGS="-O -mcpu=405" line in my demo-script have anything to do with that?I'm not back, really. And I'm pretty sure I can't help make libgcj any smaller. You probably want to talk it over with the developers -- and maybe rethink using precompiled java...
Regards, Martin
------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |