This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi Mikael, Your message popped up again for some reason, so I tried building crosstool-0.28-rc29 targeting cris with linux-2.6.7 / gcc-3.4.1 / glibc-2.2.5. It failed with
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pread.c: In function `__libc_pread': ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pread.c:52: error: `__NR_pread' undeclared (first use in this function) ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pread.c:52: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pread.c:52: error: for each function it appears in.)
so I imagine some update is needed. I'm no cris user, though, so maybe I'll let someone else look into it... - Dan
Hi!
The CRIS architecture is very much alive and locally we are running 2.6.6.
It is true that I haven't submitted any patches since 2.5.74 or something like that. It is my intention to send in a patch asap,
hopefully this week.
I will submit 2.6 patches more often in the future. Later this year we will also add support for a new CRIS subarchitecture.
/Mikael (CRIS maintainer)
-----Original Message----- From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Sam Ravnborg Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 8:42 PM To: Björn Wesén Cc: Dan Kegel; Mikael Starvik; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Delete cris architecture?
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 06:14:02PM +0200, Bjorn Wesen wrote:
The CRIS architecture is stable and supported by Axis Communications officially in 2.4, but the 2.6 port is work-in-progress, thus you could expect problems building it from the vanilla kernel source. It works in-house on 2.6, but perhaps all patches have not trickled out to the official kernel yet (although they should have I think, so it's good that you mention stuff like this).
When grepping the source and even doing cross architecture changes it is nice to have a ratehr up-to-date version in the main stream kernel.
It would be nice if Axis could at least drop an update of the tree for each kernel release (provided there are any changes). This would allow all of us to get a better overview, and in some cases we may even introduce new stuff / fix errors.
So please start to feed Andrew (or Linus) regularly with updates.
Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- My technical stuff: http://kegel.com My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change
------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |