This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
I have been successful in manifesting the bug in simple piece of code. I do not know, if it is the same problem mentioned above, but I hope it is. Snippet of code as well as compiler output attached.
./bug2.c:10: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints: (insn 63 19 21 1 ./bug2.c:9 (set (reg:QI 11 %a3) (mem:QI (plus:SI (reg/v/f:SI 10 %a2 [orig:32 x ] [32]) (reg/v:SI 0 %d0 [orig:31 i ] [31])) [0 S1 A8])) 33 {*m68k.md:826} (nil) (nil)) ./bug2.c:10: internal compiler error: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:378
Nope. This is different bug, one that I've reported:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16719
Can you take the function that ends at line 422 of the previous code,
and cull it down to just that one function? It would help a lot!
Mea culpa. The code is under constant development and I have forgotten to say author to save appropriate sources. So for now the bug does not occure. I will try to reconstruct it. I would like to ask you, if you could say me when are you planning to release new patch healing known bugs.
------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |