This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Dan Kegel wrote: > Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > on my shiny new FC3 system, i have both the standard gcc-3.4.2 > > (which i am at the moment using to build a new SH3 toolchain), as > > well as the bleeding edge preview gcc4 compiler. > > > > is there any value to trying to build (just as a test) the same > > toolchain with gcc4? would it require ugly hacks to the scripts to > > override the ubiquitous calls to "gcc" with "gcc4"? i've got spare > > CPU cycles, might as well waste them. > > No hacks needed; just make a directory ~/fakebin containing a script > named gcc that contains > > #!/bin/sh > gcc4 "$@" > > mark it executable with > chmod +x gcc > > then run demo-sh3.sh with > PATH=~/fakebin:$PATH demo-sh3.sh > > That overrides gcc just for that one run. yeah, i thought of that right after the caffeine hit. although it *would* be cleaner if all invocations of the native gcc weren't hardcoded and instead used, say, $GCC or $BUILDGCC or something to make it easier. just a thought. :-) rday ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |