Re: possible need for "no inline" patch from glibc-2.3.2?

["Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday at mindspring dot com>]

On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Dan Kegel wrote:

> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >   just because i have a spare machine and lots of CPU cycles, i
> > decided to take a shot at building a chain with
> >
> >   gcc-4.0-20041128
> >   glibc-20041204
> >   linux-2.6.9
> >
> > using gcc4 as the build compiler.  (like i said, the machine's just
> > sitting there ... what the hell?)

... snip ...

> > atof.c:29: error: Inlined_to pointer is set but no predecesors found
> > strtod/17: (inline copy in atof/16) 16 insns tree always_inline
> >   called by:
> >   calls: __strtod_internal/0
> > atof.c:29: internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed.
> > Please submit a full bug report,
> > with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> > See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.

> Also, if you want to get this fixed in gcc,
> try the latest gcc4 snapshot, and if that still has the crash,

the above *is* the latest (weekly) snapshot, although the next one is
apparently due out any minute now, i'll give it another go with that
one.

> see if you can boil it down to a ten-line test case, and
> append that to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR15398, maybe.
> But one might also argue it's a glibc bug.  They'll
> fix it one of these days, once enough people are using gcc4...

i'm not sure i'm *that* ambitious. :-)  i'm just seeing how bleeding
edge i can have the components and see how far the build gets.  and if
a patch is obvious, i'll apply it and try again.  beyond that, i'm
kind of in over my head.  at least for now.

rday

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com