This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Arno Schuring wrote: > > > > > > > The linux-libc-headers package gives you a subdirectory tree > > > containing (among others): > > > > > > include/linux > > > include/asm-$ARCH > > > include/scsi > > > > > > You should copy at least the linux/ subdir into where gcc expects to > > > find its headers (preferably $SYS-ROOT/usr/include) and copy > > > asm-$ARCH to include/asm. So far, I have never needed the other > > > subdirectories. > > > > oh, i didn't realize that. so, from the perspective of a config file, > > i can just install those sanitized headers relative to where they'd > > normally be found relative to ${GCC_DIR} and things should work? > > cool. i'll give that a shot this morning. > > Uhm... just to make sure: I did write "where gcc expects to find the > target's system headers", didn't I? They're not meant to replace > gcc's internal headers. They should be placed in the same location > where glibc places its include/ directory (and, for that matter, > where crosstool copies the kernel headers). sorry, it's early, and there are still parts of crosstool i'm fuzzy on. rday ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |