This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: will build matrix incorporate sanitized headers?

From: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday at mindspring dot com>
Cc: crossgcc list <crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 06:42:45 -0700
Subject: Re: will build matrix incorporate sanitized headers?
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504120913120.12704@localhost.localdomain>

Robert P. J. Day wrote:

  now that sanitized headers are an option, what will become of the
current build matrix?  will it need to be enhanced to reflect using
sanitized headers instead of a regular source tree?

Yes, seems like a good and neccessary idea.

I'm busy for the moment futzing with rpm stuff, so if somebody
wants to do that, please feel free to submit a patch.

And, in a perfect world, it would show not just whether
the toolchain could build the kernel, but also
whether it could build something (a medium-sized C++ program?) in userspace.

--
Trying to get a job as a c++ developer?  See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

References:
- will build matrix incorporate sanitized headers?
  - From: Robert P. J. Day

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]