This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Actually, I did a build with : gcc 3.4.1 glibc 2.3.2 binutils 2.15.94.0.2.2 This has worked for us for both kernel 2.4.18 & 2.6.11. (I had to backport some small items to 2.4.18, but they were nto major items. The major one was the compiler.h file.) Marc -----Original Message----- From: Dan Kegel [mailto:dank@kegel.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 10:25 AM To: Marc Karasek Cc: Arno Schuring; Daniel Laird; crossgcc@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: building for mips target glibc-headers target Marc Karasek wrote: > Arno wrote: >> Any 2.6.x kernel really. If you would have used gcc-3.3.x you could also >> have built a linux-2.4.x kernel with the same toolchain. > > Not to go off on a tangent, but... > > I am curious about your statement that gcc3.4.x will not compile kernel 2.4.x properly or apps for it? > > The reason I am asking is we are currently trying to move to a new cross-compiler for MIPs and need to be able to support 2.4.18 as well as 2.6.x. The build matrix at http://kegel.com/crosstool/crosstool-0.31/buildlogs/ shows some problems with mips and gcc-3.4, but it could also just problems with mips and glibc-2.3.3 and higher; glibc-2.3.2 wasn't tested. Or is Arno referring to some other source of informtion? - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |