This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 2005-04-25 at 07:27:59 Allen Curtis wrote:
Which GCC version would you consider the transitional version? Ie. The highest GCC version you can compile with 2.95.3 and the lowest version you can compile 3.4 with?
Please check out http://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html which says, among others:
"To make all languages in a cross-compiler or other configuration where 3-stage bootstrap is not performed, you need to start with an existing GCC binary (version 2.95 or later) because source code for language frontends other than C might use GCC extensions."
So 2.95 should do, but YMMV ;)
Nope... not if you want to build later versions of glibc. Believe it or not, glibc cvs requires gcc-4.0!
-- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html
------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |