Re: [PATCH] to not include a currently-included file in sanitizedheaders

["Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday at mindspring dot com>]

On Tue, 3 May 2005, Dan Kegel wrote:

> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > When you post patches, though, could you include the
> > > error message that it fixes?
> >
> >
> > good point, and perhaps you can clarify something.  if you use just
> > the sanitized headers and not the full kernel source, obviously you're
> > not going to do any configuration and, consequently, if you look under
> > the include/ directory, you'll see all of:
> >
> >   asm-alpha/
> >   asm-arm/
> >   asm-arm26/
> >
> > and so on.  however, because of no configuration, you'll never have
> > the appropriate symlink, say, asm->asm-sh.
> >
> > what that means is that you better never incorporate a header file
> > that contains anything of the form:
> >
> >   #include <asm/whatever.h>
> >
> > since it's guaranteed to fail.  that's what happened with
> > include/asm-sh/ptrace.h -- it included <asm/ubc.h> and choked.  so
> > just commenting out that single include directive was the patch.
>
> I think you must have missed the crucial line from crosstool.sh:
>   cp -r include/asm-${ARCH} $HEADERDIR/asm
> Did you use the sanitized header support built into crosstool-0.32?
> I suspect not...

hmmm .... here's my .dat file:

BINUTILS_DIR=binutils-2.15.96
GCC_DIR=gcc-4.1-20050501
GLIBC_DIR=glibc-20050502
GLIBCTHREADS_FILENAME=glibc-linuxthreads-20050502
LINUX_SANITIZED_HEADER_DIR=linux-libc-headers-2.6.11.2
EXTRA_TARGET_CFLAGS="-fno-unit-at-a-time"

i'll look more closely to see what i missed.

rday

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com