Re: crosstool and uClibc

[Robert Schwebel <robert at schwebel dot de>]

On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 07:04:31AM -0700, Daniel Kegel wrote:
> (I think I prefer separate scripts to functions, but I'm not sure.)

Ok. 

> >Dan, do you have a valuable plan about when to merge uClibc support? I'd
> >go through the porting procedure again, but IMHO it does only make sense
> >if the chances for upstream acceptance are good. 
> 
> When I last checked two months ago,
> the uclibc patches to gcc weren't quite ready to go upstream yet:
> http://www.uclibc.org/lists/uclibc/2005-May/011679.html
> 
> I guess I'll ping them again and see what the situation is.

Sounds like a plan, but I don't think that the situation has changed
significantly. 

Robert 
-- 
 Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
     Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
   Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-206917-9


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com