This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Building Native ToolChain (SH3)


On Saturday 13 August 2005 12:44 am, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 21:16 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > >>Have you read the last paragraph of
> > >>http://kegel.com/crosstool/crosstool-0.38/doc/crosstool-howto.html#cana
> > >>dian which mentions you need to edit the resulting spec file?
> > >
> > > heh, that fixed the issue on my end ... `gcc -print-search-dirs` now
> > > includes /usr/lib and /lib ...
> > >
> > > what about gcc-4.x then ?  iirc, they're getting away from external
> > > spec's, so this wont be fixable in the same way right ?
> >
> > Oy, oy, oy.
> >
> > I guess it'll take a little looking at the code to see
> > where it gets the value from now, and fix it there instead.
> > Anyone feel like looking?  (Or asking the experts?)
>
> Basically, nothing has changed with gcc-4.x. The only real difference is
> the former "default spec file" now is implicitly inside of gcc.
> Functionally it is still there.
>
> You can retrieve it with gcc -dumpspecs, you can still install an
> explicit spec-file, and you still can override values with spec file
> fragments.

ah, very good to hear info that has real basis, thanks :)
-mike

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]