Re: condensed version of question about toolchain build

[Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>]

Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>   i'm doing another build for sh3eb and i think i've sort of isolated
> a problem (at least for this).
>
>   what *works* is that i can build the toolchain with san. headers and
> then configure a kernel source tree and use that toolchain to compile
> the kernel as a whole separate operation.  (for this to work, i have
> to set PATH appropriately, and set
> CROSS_COMPILE=sh3eb-unknown-linux-gnu).  in short, it works if i do it
> in two steps.

Hey, glad to hear it.  You should mention which version of the kernel, crosstool, .dat file, etc.

>   if i try to do it all in one step, the compile of the kernel fails
> as if it's using the wrong compiler.  i'm redoing the build and saving
> the output for inspection but does the above make any sense?  (the
> errors i get from the kernel build are as if the compiler doesn't
> understand what are obviously SH3-specific compile options.)

By "in one step", what do you mean exactly?
Telling crosstool to use the non-sanitized headers, perhaps?
- Dan


--
Trying to get a job as a c++ developer?  See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com