This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Dan Kegel wrote: > mdmiller@visi.com wrote: >> Sorry, I just couldn't resist the baiting. Crosstool 0.38 for a SH4 >> target. The crosstool targets are gcc 4.1-20050716 with glibc 2.3.2 and >> 2.6.11.2 headers. This is the stock eval for the bottom line of 0.38's >> SH4 .dat file. Running on SUSE 10.0 with some kind of hideous green >> lizard. I got an error that the gcc version was old, which I could >> understand because I was running >> 4.0.2. I upgraded to 4.1.0 20051029, which is the absolute latest. > > You shouldn't have had to update; 4.0.2 is plenty new. > Please post the last 15 or so lines of the log > ending with the error message; that ought to jog > our collective memory about this. > - Dan We had this just a little while ago; there was something that was testing the gcc major version number, and it only considered 2 and 3 as possibilities and regarded all unknown versions as too old. Adding a "4)" case to a switch in a shell script fixed it. It should be possible to find in the archives pretty easily: go to google, cut and paste the error message (which you really should have quoted in your initial mail if you really want help), and add "inurl:ml/crossgcc". Ah, gottit: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/crossgcc/2005-09/msg00186.html cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |