This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: Skip libgcc?


Generally, if the libbgcc build is giving you trouble, you should try to address the problem. The primary purpose of libgcc is to supply "built in" opcodes and functions that aren?t  actually integrated into the compiler for your target architecture.

-----Original Message-----
   >From: "Chris Telting"<cdtelting-ml@comcast.net>
   >Sent: 12/24/05 4:53:18 PM
   >To: "crossgcc@sourceware.org"<crossgcc@sourceware.org>
   >Subject: Skip libgcc?
   >
   >Is there an option to skip compilation of libgcc?
   >
   >libgcc is just a static or dynamic library right?
   >
   >I'm thinking that it means that it isn't needed if your compiling 
   >libraries.  Only final executables get need be linked to it.
   >
   >
   >------
   >Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
   >Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]