This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
"Robert P. J. Day" wrote: > while not specifically a cross-compile question, i was reading the > latest docs for building gcc and it stated that, to *modify* gcc, one > needed a number of packages including gettext, version 0.14.5 or > later (allegedly in order to regenerate gcc.pot.) I don't think there were many changes between 0.14.3 and 0.14.5. They were released only about 2 months apart, and the NEWS file contains only these items: Version 0.14.5 - May 2005 * Updated the meaning of 'gcc-internal-format' to match GCC 4.0. Version 0.14.4 - April 2005 * The gettext autoconf macros will now work with the forthcoming g++ 4.0. * Fix improved detection of the locale on MacOS X. So, maybe there are some gcc4-specific features. In any case, you shouldn't actually need gettext to build gcc unless you modify any of the .po files or you configure with --enable-maintainer-mode. > but on my up-to-date FC4 system, i have only gettext-0.14.3, which > suggests that there is no more recent official release even > *available* for FC4. can anyone clarify this? just curious. i > figure there's enough gcc expertise on this list that *someone* will > know. I wouldn't exactly use FC4 as a stunning example of the most up-to-date set of packages around. Brian ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.org
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |