This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lennert Buytenhek schreef: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:31:22AM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > >>>> No, it doesn't, it's a vanilla xscale v2 based CPU. >>> Are you using a particular CPU tuning? I am working with (and tuning >>> for) an ARM926EJ-S, and will need to choose a tuning for an IXP425 >>> soon. You need at least armv5t for EABI, right? >> If you apply >> http://www.openembedded.org/repo/org.openembedded.dev/packages/gcc/gcc-4.1.1/unbreak-armv4t.patch >> to gcc 4.1.1 it magically support EABI on armv4t as well. The only (possibly eabi related) >> bug I have reported for OE built software on armv4t/eabi is >> http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1616 > > I have since rebuilt perl half a dozen times, both the Debian sid and > the FC6 perl, for armv4t and armv5te, and haven't reproduced this > miscompilation. > > If you used -Os on your build, Yes.... > you can almost certainly make the > miscompilation go away with -O1 or -O2. Great, thanks! regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFFfTmZMkyGM64RGpERAurFAKCs1TA51YROp+hCmFAchaFVo9IVGQCffTtP Unn5tPBn40qCAETLSxk5Bw0= =2F9V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |