This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hello, > Usually, we don not eed to link C libraries to our target applications. > Does gcc allow us to use such a configuration? > If it does not, do we have to downsize ourself a usual library The linux kernel and the u-boot bootloader are a few examples that are compiled that way also, thus not linked to any C-libraries, So, to me it seems possible. Maybe you can look at how those make-environments look like? So, even if you have complete toolchain, it does not mean that it is used... Remy 2007/12/7, Juju Mimi <migounet73@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > I would like to use gcc to cross-compile C language applications to > bare metal MIPS, ARM or PPC targets. > Those applications does not use any function provided with the usual C > libraries (no printf, nor memcpy etc...). > We just wanna use the cross-compiler as a single C syntax interpreter. > In case the compiler meets a call to an undefined function, we could > assume it just warns us. > Usually, we don not eed to link C libraries to our target applications. > Does gcc allow us to use such a configuration? > If it does not, do we have to downsize ourself a usual library > (assuming it is permitted to modify it)? > > thk u all, > > julian > > -- > For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq > > -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |