Support for GCC-4.3

["Deepak Barua" <dbbarua at gmail dot com>]

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:51 PM,  <crossgcc-digest-help@sourceware.org> wrote:
>
>  crossgcc Digest 24 Apr 2008 07:21:53 -0000 Issue 2084
>
>  Topics (messages 15008 through 15012):
>
>  Crosstool and /bin/sh
>         15008 by: Chuck Meade <chuckmeade@mindspring.com>
>         15009 by: Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com>
>
>  openrisc / or1k
>         15010 by: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de>
>         15011 by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
>
>  Support for GCC-4.3
>         15012 by: Jeff Gray <jeffg@magellan-technology.com>
>
>  Administrivia:
>
>  To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
>         crossgcc-digest-subscribe@sourceware.org
>
>  To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
>         crossgcc-digest-unsubscribe@sourceware.org
>
>  To post to the list, e-mail:
>         crossgcc@sourceware.org
>
>
>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Chuck Meade <chuckmeade@mindspring.com>
> To: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>
> Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:21:12 -0400
> Subject: Re: Crosstool and /bin/sh
> Dan Kegel wrote:
>  > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Jonathan and Caroline Moore
>  > <jandcmoore@gmail.com> wrote:
>  >>  If /bin/sh is not pointing at something sensible like bash then this
>  >>  can lead crosstool into lots of trouble. Ubuntu for example points at
>  >>  dash. Might save others some time if you could add a quick check.
>  >
>  > Hmm, I had tried to keep crosstool pure posix sh.  Where are the bashisms?
>
>  Hi Dan,
>
>  There are a bunch of references if you google for:
>   ubuntu dash crosstool
>
>  http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=ubuntu+dash+crosstool&btnG=Google+Search
>
>  Ubuntu uses dash for /bin/sh.  dash chokes on some glibc header file lines
>  generated by the build.
>
>  Here is a sample error line, copied from one of those Google hits:
>   /home/skorpio/crosstool-0.43/build/powerpc-405-linux-gnu/gcc-4.1.0-glibc-2.3.6/build-glibc/csu/version-info.h:2:1: missing terminating " character
>
>  Hope that helps,
>  Chuck
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com>
> To: Chuck Meade <chuckmeade@mindspring.com>
> Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:32:49 +0200
> Subject: Re: Crosstool and /bin/sh
> On 2008-04-19 15:21, Chuck Meade wrote:
>  > Here is a sample error line, copied from one of those Google hits:
>  >   /home/skorpio/crosstool-0.43/build/powerpc-405-linux-gnu/gcc-4.1.0-glibc-2.3.6/build-glibc/csu/version-info.h:2:1: missing terminating " character
>
>  Those aren't bashisms in crosstool per se, but in glibc, which you could
>  call one of the most "GNUish" pieces of software around. :)
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de>
> To: crossgcc maillist <crossgcc@sourceware.org>
> Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:20:45 +0200
> Subject: Re: openrisc / or1k
> * Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de> wrote
>
>  > is anyone already working on openrisc/or1k target for ct-ng ?
>
>  Meanwhile I've ported the current or32 stuff (drp toolchain) to ct-nt.
>  The toolchain builds fine now and can compile a simple test program.
>  (didn't check the output in the emu yet ;-o)
>
>  If anyone likes to have a patch, please let me know.
>
>
>  cu
>  --
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Enrico Weigelt    ==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
>         http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
>   Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
>         http://patches.metux.de/
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
> To: crossgcc@sourceware.org, weigelt@metux.de
> Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 21:04:33 +0200
> Subject: Re: openrisc / or1k
> On Saturday 19 April 2008 19:20:45 Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>  > Meanwhile I've ported the current or32 stuff (drp toolchain) to ct-nt.
>  [--SNIP--]
>  > If anyone likes to have a patch, please let me know.
>
>  Please submit! :-) I'll see to include that in crosstool-NG.
>
>  Regards,
>  Yann E. MORIN.
>
>  --
>  .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
>  |  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
>  | +0/33 662376056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |   ^                |
>  | --==< °_° >==-- °------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  /e\  There is no  |
>  | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | * _ * | / \ HTML MAIL    |  """  conspiracy.  |
>  °------------------------------°-------°------------------°--------------------°
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jeff Gray <jeffg@magellan-technology.com>
> To: crossgcc <crossgcc@sourceware.org>
> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:21:14 +1000
> Subject: Support for GCC-4.3
> Is anyone doing any work with crosstool for support of gcc-4.3?
>
>  Using the test release crosstool-0.44-dbtest, I modified
>  gcc-4.2.2-glibc-2.7-nptl-tls-ports.dat to be
>  gcc-4.3.0-glibc-2.7-nptl-tls-ports.dat.
>
>  This failed during configuration of GCC with the message:
>  configure: error: Building GCC requires GMP 4.1+ and MPFR 2.3.0+.
>  Try the --with-gmp and/or --with-mpfr options to specify their locations.
>  Copies of these libraries' source code can be found at their respective
>  hosting sites as well as at ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/.
>  See also http://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html for additional info.
>  If you obtained GMP and/or MPFR from a vendor distribution package, make
>  sure that you have installed both the libraries and the header files.
>  They may be located in separate packages.
>
>  GMP: http://gmplib.org/
>  MPFR: http://www.mpfr.org/
>
>  Has anyone looked at the best way of handling this?
>
>  Thanks,
>  Jeff Gray
>
>  ______________________________________________________________________
>  This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>  For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
>  ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
Hi Jeff,
            Shouldn't it work without installing those extra mpfr
libraries ....?

Regards
Deepak


-- 
Hack Hack Hack

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq