This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Nye, All, On Tuesday 28 October 2008 02:33:54 Nye Liu wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:59:43PM +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > > The architecture file should not be poisoned by C library (or any other > > component) specifics. > I agree, but i could also argue that the c library file should not be > poisoned by architecture specifics :) Not really. The glibc.sh script has to do paliatives for the /defective/ glibc configure step, so it does belong to the glibc.sh script. If it were correct, it would have been in there, not in the glibc.sh script. > In the end, i think you are more > right though, as evidenced by how much cleaner this patch is: Thanks, Applied! Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +0/33 662376056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | --==< ^_^ >==-- `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | `------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------' -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |